Primary Schools Losing More and More Male Teachers

Male teacher shortage affects boys who need role models

LINKEDIN 47COMMENTMORE

For 35 years, Len Saunders has been teaching physical education to elementary school children in Montville, N.J. Personally, he knows how important a strong male role model can be and hopes he is that for his students. His own father died just months before he was born, so he depended on uncles, coaches and other men to guide him in certain  areas of his physical and mental development. Without them, he thinks, his life would have taken a different path.

“Support from a male figure, it really contributes to their confidence level,” Saunders says of his students.

At Valley View Elementary School where he teaches, Saunders, 56, is one of very few men — he estimates just 5 percent of the staff. It’s a number he’d like to see change.

“A male role model figure is a key person in many of the boys’ lives, especially if this person is someone who listens, who’s a giving person and patient,” he says. “And there may be boys who might be afraid to ask a question to a female figure or may be more comfortable with specific questions geared for men.”

Why there’s a shortage

According to the Consortium for Policy Research in Education, only about 24 percent of all teachers were male in 2012, with just one in 10 men teaching elementary school students.

Ethan Zagore, director of the University of Notre Dame’s TRiO program, a federally funded initiative aimed at helping disadvantaged youngsters obtain an education, says a number of factors contribute to the shortage, but a big one is that many people just fundamentally — consciously or subconsciously — believe the role of an elementary teacher is better suited for women.

Jay Underwood, head of school for High Meadows School, a progressive, independent school for preschool through eighth grade in Roswell, Ga., agrees that teaching young children has long been considered a woman’s job.

“Unfortunately, this misperception — and the stigma that comes with it — has led to a dearth of men in the teaching profession,” Underwood says. “We see this in other professions as well — nursing is predominantly female, manufacturing and IT are predominantly male — so it isn’t unique to teaching.”

Another barrier is that while many colleges are focused on increasing the number of male teachers, there are not enough programs to meet the demand for their services or the increase in population, Zagore says.

And maybe most importantly, the money just isn’t there.

“Nationally, the average salary for elementary teachers is embarrassingly low,” Zagore says.

While pay can vary greatly by location, according to the most recent statistics from PayScale, a crowd-sourced database, the median salary for an elementary school teacher is $43,737.

Black male teachers in shorter supply

The absence of black male teachers is even more pronounced in U.S. schools, accounting for just 2 percent of the nation’s educators, according to a report on racial diversity released last year from the Department of Education.

Alphonso Evans, CEO and principal of Southwest Leadership Academy Charter School in Philadelphia, says he can count just two black male teachers he had growing up, memorable mainly because they were like him.

He was on track to become an emergency physician when he went into a local YMCA to do required volunteer work in a Head Start classroom. He realized education was his true path after he connected with the students in ways their female teachers could not.

“I think, especially in African-American communities, so many children are yearning for that type of attention,” Evans says.

“It’s a heavy absence of male figures in the community and it gives them hope, it gives them guidance.”

Evans just released a book on the importance of male mentorship, Tell Them They’re Great … I Dare You, and says he is continuously on a mission to recruit male teachers for his own school.

“Last time I checked it was 78 percent Caucasian female, nationally, so you’re constantly fighting that battle,” he says. “Our area of education is losing so much influence that we could be giving to our young males because of the absence of male teachers at all.”

According to the Department of Education’s report, just 42 percent of black students complete a bachelor’s degree in education, compared with 73 percent of whites.

Why boys need men

Underwood says it is important for boys to have strong male role models with open minds and challenge gender stereotypes.

“All students benefit from diverse teaching perspectives, and gender roles are a big part of that,” Underwood says. “Boys learn differently than girls, so the daily interaction of an inspiring male teacher in their learning environment is highly productive.”

David Hough, dean of the College of Education at Missouri State University, agrees that an adult male’s influence can be positive when the role model exhibits positive character traits.

“Children tend to mimic or ‘act out’ the behaviors they see,” Hough says. “In schools, male children may benefit from male teachers by observing appropriate behaviors, most notably associated with how to handle anger, respect for others and rule following.”

Can it change?

Zagore says a combination of strategic actions and a change in perception are necessary to turn around this trend, including a gradual increase in elementary teacher salaries. Colleges and universities must also serve as liaisons between male high school upperclassmen with the passion and ability to teach, and the actual elementary classroom, where these same male students can change lives after they graduate from college.

“Elementary school teachers must be compensated to reflect their impact on a student’s academic future, which is often related to their financial future,” Zagore says. “For institutions of higher education, developing a series of programs which direct students from freshman year of college to elementary classrooms and offering excellent scholarship packages for those academically achieving in majors and paths towards the teaching profession, are both essential in getting more males in elementary classrooms.”

 

Anti-men critics are driving male teachers to extinction

 

The Daily Telegraph – Louise Roberts   9/20/17

PREDICTION that male teachers will be extinct in Australian primary schools in 50 years sounds like the type of sci-fi plot line that belongs to some unwatchable dirge about robots conquering humans.

But when you consider the zeal of anti-men critics in this country and their myopic mission to dismantle masculinity, it makes perfect sense that we have skidded to this juncture.

Forty years ago, in 1977’s heyday of Her Majesty visiting our shores and Elvis dying, men made up 28.5 per cent of primary school teachers.

This week, the first national study of teacher numbers revealed that has dropped to 18 per cent.

In secondary schools meanwhile, it has slumped from 53.9 to 40 per cent.

Macquarie University’s Kevin McGrath, who led the study, referenced a national trend which he says no state or federal government is doing anything to fix. It’s shameful to see it there in black and white.

We know that a $10 billion increase in government school spending over the past decade has not improved the performance of Australian students. Compared to their international peers, our kids continue to fall further behind.

And our male teachers? Not cherished as they deserve to be.

I mean, it’s not as though it’s crucial to care about the welfare of boys and men.

At some point in our society, we have let our backbone snap and allowed the “What if?” brigade to run amok like an arsonist with a can of petrol.

The cretinous cowards push an agenda that there is something wrong with men who like kids and want to have a career nurturing and teaching them to be well-rounded individuals, gender handcuffs not required.

These are the same fools who think men in childcare are a threat and have to be kept busy with sports or something blokey, lest they become idle and pounce on a vulnerable kid.

Granted, the male teacher numbers indicate a slow decline, but it is steady and McGrath calculates that by 2067, male teachers will be stuffed like the Tasmanian tiger and worthy of a museum exhibit.

National strategies need to be put in place to keep male teachers, like St Cuthbert’s Lachlan Marsh, in our schools. (Pic: Sam Rosewarne)

 

Inadequate pay, undeniably a crime given their job of influencing the next generation, is an issue but McGrath says the key culprit is the perception that teaching is not a masculine profession.

And an even distribution of men and women enrolling in teaching degrees at university skews terribly when it comes to securing an interview and jobs.

“Men are more likely to try and pursue the things that fit those masculine traits and teaching is seen as women’s work,” McGrath said.

“The more that continues, the fewer men there are and the fewer men we see to challenge those perceptions.”

Listen to that silence. Where are the professional feminists calling out the “outrageous discrimination” and quotas they love to drone on about? What was that about decrying the patriarchy of men?

In essence, how much harder and crucifying do you think we can make it to be a man in modern society?

My kids have male teachers, adore them and cannot imagine a school life where all the staff are female. Or as my friend’s son said: “‘No offence mum, but there are some things guys just get.”

McGrath’s insight is timely given a week ago we were treated to images of coiffured wannabe A-lister Julia Gillard clinging to superstar singer Rihanna’s coat tails as the pair “hung out” in NYC and workshopped how to fix the global education crisis.

Former PM Gillard chairs the Global Partnership for Education. Three years ago it was given $140 million in taxpayer funds. Australia’s pledge from 2015-18 will bring total support for the project to $460 million.

Hmm, where do you think that cash could be better spent?

If Gillard wants to go back to school, how about tackling crises closer to home like disenfranchised male staff and NAPLAN confusion?

Ah, but there’s no swish private jets and diamond balls in that lot. It makes me wonder however, if any politician should be allowed near education.

McGrath’s study also mirrors PhD research released last month by Vaughan Cruickshank at the University of Tasmania.

University of Tasmania researcher Vaughan Cruickshank’s recent PhD study looked at strategies that may help male teachers remain in primary schools.

He wrote: “The biggest challenges male primary school teachers face are uncertainty about physical contact with students and an increased workload due to expectations to take on masculine roles.”

Compounding this, he said, was “social isolation caused by difficulties in developing positive professional relationships with colleagues”.

On a micro level, this meant setting up their classrooms to minimise incidental physical contact — even down to how the desks were laid out — and never being one-on-one with students.

“Many indicated they were happy to give an upset child a hug. However, they were fearful of other people perceiving the contact as inappropriate and making a career-ending accusation,” Cruickshank said.

I know a young male primary teacher who talks among his colleagues about how allegations of sexual misconduct have destroyed many good men’s teaching careers.

And even if they are exonerated, the public community court of appeal has likely already passed a harsh sentence which wrecks their life anyway.

While I am not a fan of gender quotas, we need to support men who want to teach and boost the number of permanent teaching positions.

When my friend’s eyes shine with pride about some of the kids he teaches, I am so grateful he has not been poisoned by the PC militia.

Men absent from classrooms can leave many fatherless boys to struggle even more. Girls too need the protection and leadership.

As another teacher friend said to me last night, young boys particularly in later primary years are at an age developmentally when good men in their lives can have such an important influence for the future.

As McGrath says: “They (students) can come to school and see men and women interacting in positive and nonviolent ways and also see men respond to female leadership.”

In other words, a school environment reflecting what happens in the real world.

@whatlouthinks

 

RendezView welcomes robust but civil discussion on our columns. Abuse of columnists or other readers and defamatory remarks will not be published and may result in a ban from commenting.

COMMENTS

JamesSep 25, 2017

When will the idiot decision makers in our education system wake up to themselves and realise that males and females are physiologically and psychologically different. Just as important, our children are all individuals, however the education system seems to want a “one size fits all” solution and allow our schools to be a factory that turns out a single product.

Those that cannot “conform” are said to have “slipped between the cracks”. Nice excuse!  Funny how when our kids fail at school, the school blames our kids and when the school fails our kids, they still blame the kids.

The school system needs a good balance of male and female teachers.  My son generally responds better to male teachers. Due to my boy’s high anxiety levels and mild ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) he isn’t always the best student. My wife and I have found after so many years, male teachers have a tendency to deliver discipline and then let the matter drop. My son responds well to this and feels he can put his transgressions behind him and start over again. Conversely, female teachers seem to drag a disciplinary matter out for days and will often bring up old matters again, effectively punishing him for for things he has already been punished for.

The imbalance of gender in education is just one thing that is broken in our education system. Some educational content is highly questionable and inappropriate. Methods of lesson delivery are outdated and ineffective. School disciplinary measures are ineffective to say the least, and counter-productive and damaging at the worst. At the end of the “manufacturing” process, our education system is turning out a “product” that is not prepared for the workplace and ill-prepared to meet the challenges of life.

Just who do we have to (metaphorically) crack across the back of the head to get this broken system fixed?!!

 

 

 

 

Domestic Violence in the US

 

 

Domestic Violence in the US

Intimate Partner Violence – Causes, Frequency, and Risk Factors in the 

by Charles Montaldo

Updated March 30, 2017

Over the past 25 years, the National Institute of Justice has worked to educate the public and policymakers about the widespread problem of domestic violence in the US. Because of the increased exposure, there has been more public awareness and policies and laws have been instituted, resulting in the decrease of 30% in domestic abuse.

In an effort to learn more about domestic violence and the effect of the policies designed to help combat it, the NIJ has sponsored a series of studies over the years.

The results of the research have been two-fold, by first identifying the top causes and risk factors surrounding domestic violence and then by taking an in-depth look at how and if the policies designed to combat it are actually helping.

As a result of the research it was determined that some of the policies, such as removing firearms in homes where there is domestic violence, offering increased assistance and counseling to the victims, and prosecuting the violent abusers, have helped women get away from violent partners and decreased the number of domestic violence incidents over the years.

What was also revealed was that some of the policies may not be working and in fact, could be detrimental to the victims. Intervention, for example, sometimes has an adverse effect and can actually endanger the victims because of an increase in retaliatory behavior by the abusers.

It was also determined that those domestic abusers who are considered to be “chronically aggressive” will continue to be abusive no matter what type of intervention is given including arrest.

By identifying the major risk factors and causes of domestic violence, the NIJ can focus their efforts where it most needed and modify policies that are found to be ineffective or detrimental.

Major Risk Factors and Causes of Domestic Violence

Researchers found that the following situations either put people at greater risk of being a victim of intimate partner violence or were the actual causes of domestic violence.

Early Parenthood

Women who became mothers at the age of 21 or under are twice more likely to become victims of domestic violence than women who became mothers at an older age.

Men who have fathered children by age 21 were more than three times as likely to be abusers as men who were not fathers at that age.

Problem Drinkers

Males who have severe drinking problems are at a greater risk for lethal and violent domestic behavior. More than two-thirds of the offenders who commit or attempt homicide used alcohol, drugs, or both during the incident. Less than one-fourth of the victims used alcohol and/or drugs.

Severe Poverty

Severe poverty and the stress that comes with it increase the risk of domestic violence. According to studies, households with less income have higher incidents of domestic violence reported. In addition, the reductions in aid to families with children are also associated with an increase in domestic violence.

Unemployment

Domestic violence has been linked to unemployment in two major ways. One study found that women who are victims of domestic violence have a more difficult time finding employment. Another study found that women who receive aid for themselves and their children were less stable in their jobs.

Mental and Emotional Distress

Women who experience severe domestic violence face overwhelming mental and emotional distress. Almost half of the women suffer from major depression, 24% suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder, and 31% from anxiety.

No Warning

A woman’s attempt to leave their partner was the number one factor in 45% of the women murdered by their partners. One in five women killed or severely injured by their partner had no warning. The fatal or life-threatening incident was the first physical violence they had experienced from their partner.

How Widespread is Domestic Violence?

Statistics from select studies sponsored by the National Institute of Justice shows how large a problem domestic violence is in the US.

  • Every year approximately 1.3 million women and 835,000 men are physically assaulted by their partners.
  • Women are significantly more likely than men to be injured during an intimate partner assault (39 percent compared with 24.8 percent).
  • Out of all women murdered in the US each year, 40-50% were murdered by their intimate partners. In 70-80% of the homicides that occurred during incidents of domestic violence, no matter which partner was killed, the man physically abused the woman before the murder.
  • Sexual assault or forced sex occurs in approximately 40-45% of the relationships where there is domestic abuse.
  • Among those surveyed, the lifetime occurrence of domestic violence for women age 18 and older was nearly 25% and 7.6% for men.

In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began the National Intimate and Sexual Violence Surveillance program to gather and distribute additional information for each state about the frequency of domestic violence, sexual violence, and stalking.

The results of a 2010 survey conducted by the NISVS showed that on average, 24 people per minute are victims of rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner in the US. Annually that equals more than 12 million women and men.

These findings emphasize the need for continued work in the development of strategies for prevention and in bringing effective help to those in need.

Rise of Domestic Violence – UK

 

Domestic violence

Hidden rise in violent crime driven by growth in violence against women

While violence against men continues to fall, new research uncovers upward trend coinciding with austerity-led cuts to domestic violence services

Damien Gayle

 @damiengayle

Tue 12 Jan 2016 19.01 ESTLast modified on Tue 28 Nov 2017 23.19 EST

A rally against cuts to domestic violence services in November 2015, led by Sisters Uncut; women’s groups say there is a link between cutbacks and the rise in violence. Photograph: Natasha Quarmby/Demotix/Corbis

Women are bearing the brunt of an invisible rise in violent crime, a new analysis shows. Domestic violence and violence against women have increased since 2009, researchers found, pushing up overall levels of violent crime.

The findings contradict the official message that violent crime has been in decline since the mid-90s. They also begin to challenge the assertion that men are the most likely victims; violent crime against men continues to fall.

A team led by Sylvia Walby, Unesco chair in gender research and a professor of sociology at Lancaster University, discovered the rise in violent crime after looking again at data collected by the Crime Survey of England and Wales(CSEW) between 1994 and 2014.

Violent crime against women massively understated, statistics agency told

Official statisticians cap the number in a series of crimes that a single person can report to the survey at five, to stop outliers skewing the statistics. But Walby argues that this method excludes the experiences of “high frequency” victims – particularly victims of domestic violence – who often make up more than 5% of respondents.

To take these victims into account, Walby and her colleagues instead looked at all reported crimes. The new study also slightly alters the definition of violent crime to include sexual offences such as rape, which are usually given their own category in CSEW figures.

Abandoning the cap and including sex crimes shows the fall in violent crime reached a turning point in 2009, when a rise in domestic violence and violence against women by acquaintances begins. Although violence against women by strangers remains flat, and violence against men continues to fall, the rises are so marked they fuel an overall rise in violent crime.

Women’s groups say it is no coincidence that the rise begins at the same time as the financial crisis and the beginning of austerity politics in Britain. They are calling for a reversal of cuts to specialist domestic violence services. Many have closed as a result of belt-tightening in local government since 2010.

UK violent crime rates over the past two decades, as measured by the Crime Survey of England and Wales and broken down by violence against men and violence against women

The change coincides with the repercussions of the financial crisis, the researchers point out. “The turning point in the rate of these violent crimes is consistent with an explanation focused on the reduced economic independence of women and the impact of the cuts to services on which women disproportionately depend,” they write, although they add that more investigation is needed.

Vivienne Hayes, chief executive of the Women’s Resource Centre, said that while austerity had played a part in the rise in violence against women, some of it was also the result of a troubling resurgence of sexism.

“While we are deeply saddened by the results of Walby’s research, we are not surprised,” she said. “Our member organisations have been telling us repeatedly that demand for their services, which include rape crisis centres and small specialist Violence Against Women and Girls services, has rocketed, whilst investment in services has plummeted.

 A refuge provided safety for me and my family, others are not so lucky now

Charlotte Richardson Andrews

“Research from a range of sources strongly suggests that over the last few years our societal view of women, from violent pornography, violent computer games, street harassment and everyday sexism, to the lack of women in positions of leadership and the attempt to remove women’s contribution to political progress in the A level curriculum, is creating a view of women which nurtures and normalises our violation.

“Only when we take a bird’s eye view of all of these issues and develop a joined up strategy to tackle them head on, will we see a reduction in violent crime against women.”

WRC cited House of Commons research showing that direct taxes and social security cuts will take £9.6bn net a year from families – £7bn of which is from women. The group’s own research has found that 95% of women’s organisations had experienced cuts, rising to 100% for BME women’s organisations.

The CSEW is a face-to-face survey asking people about their experiences of a range of crimes in the past year. It is regarded as the gold standard of crime statistics since it includes unreported crimes and is unaffected by changes in police recording practices.

Official statisticians have argued that the cap on the number of crimes a single person can report to eliminate volatility in the results, allowing them to better identify trends. Walby and her colleagues get around that problem by instead using a three-year moving average of statistics.

Survivors of domestic abuse most often report not just one incident of violence and intimidation, or even several, but a systematic and sustained campaign of repression that can last years.

That was the case with Ava Freebody, from Sussex, who spent 27 years with her abusive husband before she was finally able to escape. She has contempt for any suggestion that crime statistics would cap the number in a series of incidents reported by a single victim, calling it ridiculous.

“How can you possibly put a cap on something and say that after five times it doesn’t count? I remember all the incidents, I remember all the things that were done to me, and to say we are only going to count five times makes me feel worthless,” she said. “It’s like somehow this is your fault, it’s like if this had happened more than five times then you must have been asking for it.

“I think we have a situation here where I think of this as domestic terrorism. If the perpetrators were Isis we would be throwing so many resources into it and we would recognise the repeated attacks on liberties and health.”

Walby also condemned the capping, saying it “omits crimes and therefore biases the crime rate downwards – it is lower than it should be. The objection to taking the cap off is that this introduces more year-to-year volatility. Uncapping and [giving] three-year moving averages provides an unbiased figure that also solves the volatility problem.”

Christina Jay, an activist with Sisters Uncut, which campaigns against cuts to such services, added: “This research proves the urgent need for meaningful investment in domestic violence support. We hope the government acknowledges the undeniable human cost of austerity and put substantial measures, policies and funding commitments in place to make sure that all domestic violence survivors can flee violence and live safely.”

 

STALKING AS A SYMPTOM OF LONELINESS

 

CORI ANNE WEBER – DID YOU KNOW FACTS.COM

 

6 WARNING SIGNS YOU’RE SUFFERING FROM LONELINESS. HERE’S HOW TO BEAT IT.

 

Cori Anne Weber

There are 6 common behaviors that indicate loneliness, but many people don’t realize it. In fact, loneliness plagues 1 out of every 5 Americans, and can be detrimental to your physical health.

If you or someone you know might be lonely, be on the lookout for any of the following behaviors.

#6. OFTEN IN BED, BUT NOT SLEEPING

Studies suggest that lonely people spend a lot more time in bed, but a lot less time sleeping. Chronic loneliness can cause insomnia because you need to feel secure in your social environment in order to sleep well. Also, the effects of loneliness can make you feel like you need to get in bed, even if you aren’t tired.

 

Solution: Your view of the world or your current situation is usually the culprit, so seeing a therapist, structuring your days, or exploring everything from medication to exercise can be helpful, according to psychologists.

#5. FACEBOOK ADDICTION

One quick Google search is proof that multiple studies have been conducted regarding Facebook addiction. The common denominator of their results is that people who are addicted to Facebook are trying to fill a void of social interaction. This behavior is counterproductive, because most people only present the best sides of themselves on Facebook, so a lonely person who’s constantly scrolling through their newsfeed is regularly seeing others looking their happiest – which only encourages self-isolation.

Solution: Get in touch with an old friend instead of stalking their profile. Trying to fill a social void with virtual content is like looking at a picture of pizza when you’re hungry instead of actually eating it.

 

 Around the Web#4. EXCESSIVE AMOUNT OF LONG, HOT SHOWERS

Yale psychologist John Bargh, PhD, conducted many studies that showed lonely people take longer and hotter showers. Actually, according to his results, the lonelier the person, the longer the shower and the hotter their preferred temperature.

 

Solution: Bargh found that physical coldness equals feelings of social coldness, and a lot of people don’t realize it. Taking that hot shower is making you feel better inside, so seeking out warmth in other ways can also be helpful. Drink hot chocolate, start a fire, or curl up with a heating pad to help soothe your negative feelings.

. OBSESSED WITH NEEDING TO BUY MORE ‘STUFF’

It’s called “material possessions love,” and it’s another big sign that you’re trying to fill a void by buying things.

 

Solution: Research has repeatedly shown that having more things does not increase happiness. Starting a hobby or planning a vacation is much more healing than getting a new TV or another pair of shoes. It also puts you in situations that expose you to social interaction, which is what you’re really in need of.

 

#2. WEIGHT GAIN

Here you are, filling that void again, only this time you’re doing it with lasagna and ice cream. The common theme from most of these behaviors is addiction and excess. Whether it’s food, ‘stuff,’ lying in bed, or social media, you’re using easily accessible things to replace human connection.

Solution: Be social. A study showed that socializing can actually help you stay skinny. The research was only done using mice, so take these results with a grain of salt. But the idea makes sense if you know you’re eating too much because you feel lonely.

#1. ALWAYS SICK

You might think a lot of human contact exposes you to more contagious illnesses, but loneliness can potentially make you even sicker.

 

Psychologist John Cacioppo from the University of Chicago has done numerous studies on the biological effects of loneliness. He’s found that lonely people have much higher rates of all-cause mortality, high blood pressure, cancer, infection, heart disease, inflammation, high blood pressure, and learning and memory problems.

The reason why: Isolating yourself makes your immune system lazy toward viral invasion because it has a fixed fighting capability; it has to decide whether to focus on protecting against viral threats or bacterial invasions. If you’re chronically lonely, you send signals to your body that bacteria is more of a threat to you than a virus.

Solution: According to Cacioppo, two of the best ways to treat loneliness are to train yourself for the social skills you need to view the world positively and to share good times with good people.

If you consistently fall into any of these behaviors, psychologists say your best bet is to start nurturing your relationships – because finding just one person to connect with can make all the difference in the world.

 

 

6 Warning Signs You’re Suffering From Loneliness. Here’s How To Beat It.